Showing posts with label summer exhibition 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label summer exhibition 2011. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

FEELINGS IN ART - A THEMATIC EXHIBITION


SATURDAY, JULY 16, 2011


IN THIS POST I WILL TALK ABOUT A MAJOR ART EXHIBITION WITH THE THEME  "FEELINGS", AND OFFER SOME THOUGHTS ON EMOTIONS IN ART. THERE WILL BE A LITTLE HISTORY AND REVIEW OF THE ARTWORK THAT WON THE CONTEST. AT THE END ALSO A NOTE ON BRITISH FOOD CULTURE ...

Both Martin and I got our artwork accepted for the annual " MOMA" (Museum of Modern Art) Tabernacle exhibition in Machyntlleth, Wales. "What is art?" A quote by Leo Tolstoy was the basis for the theme and at the awards ceremony the curators told us that Tolstoi answered the question as follows: "Art is not a craft, but the communication of feelings the artist has experienced". Of course it is a statement typical of his time and not a comprehensive explanation of what art really is (something that the curators doid not take a stand for).


Moma Award 2011
Had we been aware we could have found out about the theme a long time ago and so we could have done something specifically for the exhibition, as many certainly do. In retrospect, when one sees the other artwork that was accepted into the exhibition, one tends to ruminate that some other work than the one one submitted might have done better. Well,  c'est la vie. We recieved no price but at least we got in. Nearly 300 works by as many artists were displayed -  a third was rejected by the jury.
This is my contribution,  the collage "Some things should never be forgotten", copyright 2011
Sea and Water symbolize emotions and are often present in my work.
The volcano is quite an obvious symbol of male aggression
and repressed emotions. 

I'll leave the rest to the viewer, but there is more than this in a paradoxical way, 
it's also about a positive experience of masculinity and sexuality.
My collage has been squeezed in a corner ...
many small works were difficult to see because they were hanging too low or too high. 

Otherwise, I think it's nice with big shows and lots of art . 
A stern Welshman behind me ..?
Martin's piece is "The Longing of the Sea",
he has also used the sea as a symbol of emotions.
The background is digital, the figure painted in oil and tempera.
Emotions are a tricky chapter. It is of course one of the broadest themes you can think of as emotions so often are present in the artistic expression. I think people tend to enter work that express very easily identifiable feelings, as they are probably more likely to be chosen than more subtle expressions. In this exhibition, there are quite a few portraits with emotional facial expressions, and bodies in different positions.
Eugene Delacroix, "Freedom leads people", 1813
The expression of emotions of the individual became popular at the beginning of the 19th Century and found its way into the arts - it was the Romantic era. As with all trends, it's one that comes and goes in different forms. In the past, creating a painting took weeks and months (much like Martin's art as he's using  the mischung technique). Expressionism, on the other hand, was the spontaneous expression of emotions using a very direct, fast and strong painting style. It is an art style that was fashionable about a century ago. Although there are always those who want to paint in the expressionist way and do so with panache, whether figurative or abstract, it tends more often to be a case of art therapy. As far as symbolism goes, I am well aware that the meaning of symbols is unfamiliar to most people. Allusions to the sea and water  therefore usually go unnoticed, although an attentive viewer can have an intuitive understanding of them. Symbols can easily become ends in themselves and should only function as the support or structure of a complex content. In my art I would say that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts (the symbols). It is also more than just allegory or metaphor, as I am striving for deeper emotional meaning.

Although the jury intended to take into consideration the feelings that (anecdotally) have been present in the creation of an artwork, even if the content may not be that emotional, I think such feelings are rarely obvious enough so that the jury with confidence will be able to say that "it was emotionally interesting." It requires more time, insight and intuition than many have during the curating of an exhibiton (I myself have acted as curator in the past, so I know what it is like). It is also common that the feeling contents run counter with technical ability as emotional eloquence normally requires a high level of skill. Many of the most acclaimed works were in fact more aesthetically pleasing than emotionally expressive.

As expected, the winning work was an expressive portrait with a strong facial expression. There were some anatomical problems with the hand, possibly as a result of the painting's presumed spontaneity (though I must admit that the hand bothers me). In and of itself an interesting ambivalence was present, and  the emotional expression wasn't too obvious as it was pointing to a complex and perhaps conflicting inner experience that seems to stand outside time and space. The colour scheme is interesting and suggests internal conflict as well. We noticed that most of the artwork were drab, and we think it has more to do with Wales than with a desired artistic expression.
Marcelle Hanselaar (photo MOMA )
Second prize went to another portrait in the Renaissance style that the judges felt had a mysterious "Mona Lisa Smile". This to me starts to sound like clichés. I also think that the idea of ​​painting the facial details neatly but the clothes in a sloppy and badly painted way is a frequently seen style, a way that I do not think is particularly effective. The picture feels a little "derivative" as Martin and I always say.
Serena Jones (photo MOMA )
As the third prize, I would probably have chosen something other than an image that looked as if it was drawn back in the 1930's ... The feeling seems to be more present in the expressive charcoal drawing than in the content. No, no great art in this sketch, no.
Jill Cope (photo MOMA )
It's nice that the children are encouraged to be creative within the framework of a serious gallery. I have absolutely no experience in children's art but it was still pretty obvious that some children had received guidance from parents or other adults. Another problem is that what looks interesting in the adults' eyes often has come about accidentally as children do not see the world the same way as adults do, and generally create in a lot more subconscious way. 
Ayesha Woodward (photo MOMA )
In this work by a 9-year-old the decorative foreground feels like a random phenomenon. Martin and I thought an atmospheric picture of a rainy day in Wales by a 14-year-old seemed genuine and spontaneous. 


An additional prize will be offered and it is the visitors' choice. I nominated an installation of a bra with ambivalent text that I thought was quite handsome and a less obvious choice. In the class under 18 year olds.Martin and I both nominated the same picture by the 14-year old above.

On the whole, I must say that the artistic level was quite high and not bad for a provincial gallery, and once more I see that people around here are very artistically talented. It's all of us poor wretches who want to make art but can not afford to live anywhere else. (Perhaps I should point out that Martin has not always been this poor, on the contrary. But to do that you really enjoy is not always lucrative, we do need more than just good will). However, I felt that I once again ended up in a competitive stance and it felt a bit uncomfortable. It is easy to slip into negative thoughts about how much better one should be or whether one should really carry on with the task of being an artist.

Finally, I must comment on the nibbles that galleries often offer here in the UK. There is always wine. At lunch time, it is often a sandwich and chips. Unfortunately, it's always the classics:, i.e. cheese with raw onions (ugh), egg and cucumber, tuna and various forms of meat that we don't eat. Why salad is added to the meat and not the vegetarian options is an insoluble mystery ... 

THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF ART SUMMER EXHIBITION





The Culture Show is an interesting cultural program on TV that we are able to watch online - unfortunately they don't have regular shows throughout the year. Culture doesn't cease to exist and evolve and this is a show that is truly informative! Yesterday we saw a show that was dedicated to the major summer exhibition at The Royal Academy of Arts in London. We will probably not have the opportunity to visit it but I will still offer some opinions on the basis of what we saw in the program, nicely commented upon by Alastair Sooke ( see video ). This summer's exhibition is the 243th and, therefore already an institution.


Anyone can participate in the exhibition and this year the jury had more than 1,200 works to plow through. It thus becomes a smorgasbord of many hundreds of works, and although it is notoriously difficult to enter, there are artists who have submitted their works for years on end. PJ Crooke is one of them - she has been accepted 12 times! Her art is reminiscent of Henri Rousseau and seems more meaningful  than most other works that fought for wall space, at least at first glance. Her world is a fantasy world with dreamy elements that might encompass some symbolic meaning. Unfortunately, I found no work on the web. With the reservation that all art forms are likely to be represented in the exhibition, I am nonetheless pleased that this type of art has its place in the big picture. Most of what is exhibited is obviously only about being "clever" and not much else.

As far as I could see from the program,  numerous pieces of art were nauseatingly bad and it seems the critics agree. One must wade through a lot of junk in order to find the gems. I did however feel that the works hailed by critics were noteworthy, innovative, and owned a certain aesthetic sense, yet  one might have to look for deeper significance. Though I really appreciate exciting artistic ideas and innovation, I am deeply disappointed at how uninterested art connoisseurs seem to be in discussing life's deeper meaning.

The sculpture that won the Wollaston prize is a round silvery disc made of some kind of foam is casually leaning against the wall. Something that looks like rust and a bulging decoration on the surface occupies the upper right corner. 

Charles Wollaston Award 2011

Alison Wilding RA  hock won the prestigious £ 25,000 Charles Wollaston Award for her work in the Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2011th Presented To The 'most distinguished work' in the Summer Exhibition, the award presents one of the most Significant Art Prize awarded in the countryside.
POSTSCRIPTUM:
Martin and I did get the opportunity of seeing the show after all, when he was at the Great Britons interview at the Royal Academy of Art. It was an overwhelming show, and we didn't have much energy after a long day. You do get a cross section of what people create these days though, this is interesting to us.


Nonetheless, it was great to see that lots of art was being sold, though in all honesty the members of the Royal Academy were asking prices a "normal" artist could never dream of. We found that most of the art were pieces by members of the Royal Academy. There's obvious elitism, not least as the members were able to show up to five pieces each and not all of it was that great. There was bad art - but there was also a lot of good stuff. Most techniques one could think of were represented. Still it might well be worth trying to enter this show in spite of the hazzle of getting it there - apparently you stand a good chance of selling if you do get in. It's very expensive though, £130 just to submit your work!